Shop Mobile More Submit  Join Login
About Varied / Hobbyist Aaron-KunMale/United States Recent Activity
Deviant for 8 Years
Needs Core Membership
Statistics 1,451 Deviations 37,116 Comments 130,303 Pageviews

Newest Deviations

Favourites

Watchers

Activity


Hello Dear Reader,It's the Badcop69. and while my name may sound crude I assure you that I myself am in the up and up. so this won't be so much a personal story as a mostly dry research into the world most dare not go into.

 Some hackers have dumped "personal" information of some 30 million users who were signed up at one time to Ashley Madison. Ashely Madison was warned that if they didn't shut down the site then the hackers would release the information of it's user base online and Ashely Madison said no. So the hackers (whom some herold as heros,but I do not) leaked the information online much the amusement and horror of the viewing public.

 The hackers did so for a number of reasons. firstly that Ashely Madison has others ventures online including a site where rich people can sign up to hook up with much younger woman,a male prositute site and supposidly they are also involved in human trafficing... most claims which I have seen next to no evidence as being real (but if you the audience or even the hackers wish to correct me with some evidence then I'll kindly recant this part of my rant.) but I'll get a little more into that in a moment. The second charge is that well..Ashely Madison is a scam.   Oh they give you what you pay for as far as hooking you up. but to have yourr account and information scrubbed from the site is 200$ and there is no garuntee that they actually delete all your information.

 So let me get to the first charge and work my way back. Firstly "Human trafficing" this is a term that is really really hard to deal with because what do they mean by it? are we going by the dictionary " hu·man traf·fick·ing
noun
  1. the illegal movement of people, typically for the purposes of forced labor or commercial sexual exploitation." 
or are we going by the more expanded deffinition which can,if one is so inclinded,include women who choose to go into porn of their own free will.  www.theguardian.com/com…  which is extremely dishonest and I know cause I personally know a few porn stars (one of whom left a job in STEM field to work in porn).  the point is that one MUST define ones terms lest they fall into the same comfirmation bias that leads people like anti-porn feminists to see strong able bodied porn actresses as victims whom need to be saved from themselves.  and that's not okay because we can no longer levi the claim of "human trafficing" and have it mean what the deffintion of Trafficing actually is. not what we want the deffinition to be.  so for a claim like this I need proof not just your word. because it's too easy to see a hacker or even an astronaut as being immune from frailties of the human mind and bias and yet,as recent events have shown: www.msn.com/en-us/video… that is not just untrue but absurd.

 Now onto the second claim. That is the one that people should give a shit about because this just a more dressed up version of earlier scams: www.huffingtonpost.com/… there was another website that would post your personal information and a photo and then label you a sex offender and you had to pay 100$ to get your information off the site after you prove you aren't a sex offender. all these have no garuntee that they will actually take your information off even if you pay them in full. People use social stigmas to scam people out of money especially if they can get a hold of your information. what Ashely Madison was doing in this respect is absolutely wrong and I agree with the hackers on this.

 Sadly that's not what people care about the most. what people care about is that people cheated on their spouces and I often hear it talked about in mostly male terms (we don't know the break down as of yet but there are women on the site as well who were registering,we assume,to cheat on their husband or their wife since hey gay marriage is a thing now) and this is perhapse the most shameful thing out of all of this. we don't care that Ashley Madison might be linked the human trafficing (again citiation needed for that) we don't care that they used social stigmas to blackmail people who wanted off the site or charged their minds about cheating. no we care that people cheated.

 For one thing this information doesn't always effect the people finding out about it as seen here: www.newser.com/story/21…  but if that wasn't enough we have to look at what is cheating. No I won't pull out the dictionary this time cause that's not what I mean. the point is often that we look at cheating through the eyes of monagamy and yet we in general aren't monagamous species if you look at the history of relationships dating back to as far as we have documented: www.tubeplus.is/.../Pen…  www.google.com/url?sa=…

 We often like to think in a very Disney-esc kind of way that someday we meet someone special..we fall madly in love with them and after a time we marry them and maybe have kids and live happily ever after. But that's not how things go. and sometimes Cheating is not only warrented but healthy for a marriage as seen here: www.slate.com/articles/…  then there are people who are actively polyamourous as seen here: 
watch-series-tv.to/episode/pen…  who even have kids and the kids aren't alway poly themselves.  Now polyamoury ISN'T the same as polygamy. Polygamy is the idea of marrying multiple people but doesn't always involve love. Polyamory actually does involve love and tends to involve loving more then one person on a deep deep level.

 I've met many Poly artist here on DeviantArt and they actually taught me what that was since it's very taboo to speak about it in general and considered a dirty word.  persons who are poly are seen as people "cheating with permission" which is still seen as cheating. they get subjected to slut shaming and all manners of being seen as unclean because they're genitals are in more then one person. which is silly if you stop to think about it especially since women are seen as std riddeled whores while the men are mostly just seen as commitent phobic dogs.  and for once rad fems are right that this sort of thing is really stupid and can be harmful if the people are in the wrong community and get shunned. people can seriously lose their jobs in the wrong town.

 beyond that there are extenuating circumstances. example: I have a co-worker who shall remain nameless. he was married and his wife suffered a horrible accident that left her paralized mostly from the waist down. as you can imagine she lost more then just sensation in her genitals,she lost interest in sex.  to his credit my friend and co-worker stayed faithful to his wife even when she gave him the go ahead to cheat on her so long as he stayed with her. and it tore him up inside. eventually he found a mate in another friend and co-worker of mine whom I'll call jane.  they fell madly in love but the guy wouldn't go all the way with my friend despite having permission to do so.  we talked and talked about his struggle and I did my best to set him straight on things. He divorced his wife and then later married my friend Jane. their blended family is very very happy and they are as well.  Now my friends are great people. not hoe's and homewreckers. they found love in an unlikely situation.  but their situation isn't all that different to what I hear coming from places like upper society. where if the male of the house cannot perform the wife is given permission to cheat and often they do indulge. and we know they indluge because sometimes it becomes very public: www.nydailynews.com/new…
 yet we don't bash the rich and powerful when they do it. and we know that some higher up then that have mistresses www.cnbc.com/2015/04/17…  yet we don't condemn them for that practice. one that dates back long into human history.www.google.com/url?sa=…   

  and all this is coming from me. I am polyamours but I am planning on spending the rest of my life with one woman. she is an amazing woman who completes me like no one else can and I love her dearly. Despite my proclivity I have no desire (nor time) to cheat on her because I have been cheated on by a woman who was an absolutely scumbag. who cheated on me without caring for my feelings. But I have also been cheated on by a woman who hated how deeply she hurt me and yet she went on to marry the man she cheated on me with,have a kid and is living happily ever after.

 some people who cheat are just what we think...scum. others however aren't scum or horrible people. my point is that at the end of the day I don't know any of the people on the list,so far as I can tell, and neither do you. and it's hipocrisy to not want to be judged as a group,for what ever you may stand for or be a part of,and then turn around and judge people as a group. and the ones I see doing the shaming are just that,Hipoctites mascurating as some kind of high and mightey,holier then thou kinds who feel they have every right to point and laugh at these people or to call them stupid,not because Ashely Madison is grifiting them,but because they signed onto a site for cheaters,because cheating is always bad always. well fuck you is the best I can say to that.
 
Recently I was able to pick up a pre-owned Xbox one from Gamestop (long story as to how and maybe someday I'll tell it) and with it I rented a copy of "Halo the Master Chief Collection" and played through the entire set of games (minus odst which hides the fact that it's DLC and cannot be played from the disc alone, once more that's another rant for another time) and through playing is once more I came to realize something that I often missed when having played the first 4 games before. I care about Cortana.

 Halo always gets a bad rap as the game that ruined gaming forever. a claim that I honestly don't understand because the only co-herent rant I have ever heard cites that it started the game mechanic of rechargable health or sheilds which somehow ruined gaming forever by,in their words, cheapening games making them more easily accessable to noobs who couldn't get through the game any other way. I feel that so much assumption goes into why people blame halo for the death of gaming that I feel it's reputation is a tad on the exaggerated side. after all did Halo create the more prevelent always online model that is creeping into gaming? did it invent or even use microtransactions? has it created a subscription service where you have to sign up for it just access the game and then charge you a subscription fee in oder to access the game? has the game gone mobile,been free to pay but with it's best features locked behind a pay wall?   the answer to all this is no.

Bungie could have have put out a halo every year,only updating small aspects of the game and making us pay for subscriptions for premium content while making the games concept shallower and more thinly stretched. they could have created an entire system where by the A.I. is made of of ghost data of other players that absolutely needs an online connection in order to work. They could have, but they didn't. and since taking on the rechargable life bar argument I have found that largely no one has come up with any real argument as to why halo is bringer of the woe's of modern gaming ans thus a game to be scorned. yet the title still presists in the lager gaming community. which is sad.

 I didn't not,however, come here to defend halo against the gaming community which both loves and yet hates it at the same time. I have come instead to speak about character and how it all fits into the narrative that Anita Sarkeesian and others have constructed to make it seems like not is halo a shall shooter with nothing of substance to it,but even worse that the game actively hates women and tries to degrade that at every turn through "sexualized" representations of women such as Cortana.

 Maybe you could make the case that Halo doesn't respect women if you take Halo for the first game. You might, if you're clever, even make the case with game two. But to look at the story as a whole and the roles Cortana has played and then say that Halo not only doesn't respect women but actively or passively hates them,then you seriously haven't spent time with the games as a whole.

 Cortana is,in many senses of the world,an object.  he's an A.I. construct made for no other reason then to assist the player character. if written like that she could be one dimensional,showing no signs of emotion or character. with no conflicts lest the player die with her in their virtual heads.  But she wasn't.

 If Cortana had been written in the social justice way then she'd have even less agency then she actually has. that is to say that when she was taken by the gravemind in Halo 3 it should have traumatized her and we should have spent most of halo 4 with a broken Cortana as we set off to avenge her "rape" at the hands of the gravemind. and for those who haven't played three I will clarify by saying there was no rape but these days anything done to a woman by a male voiced character is rape to these people and must be shown as such or it's anti-woman and pro-rape.

 My point is that Cortana would have not been able to assist the cheif,something Halo 4 really demonstrates that she wanted to do and that it was her choice. from which spartan she wanted to serve with to if she even wanted to serve at all. something a passive observer might miss,especially if they never play the game. but more over Cortana would be as strong as she was in halo 4 showing that she could take the same kind of punishement as any of her male counterparts and even dish it out.

 I could post youtube play throughs to support this further but what I really want to get at most is the fantastic job Jennifer Lee did in bringing Cortana to life. she gave character and layers and depth to character that by all means should have been forgetable and as dispossable as her purpose could be. Because I cannot watch the end of halo 4 (spoiler alert just in case you haven't played halo 4 but intend to) without crying. I care about John the spartans relationship to Cortana. I care what they went through and how much they learned how to depend on one another. I care that they know each other better then they know themselves and can trust each other not to miss use that knowledge. you get the sense that Cortana see's things in the Cheif that he doesn't even see himself and in many ways she made it possible for John to shed his inhumanity and become more human. You get the sense that she never regrets her choice to be aid to John and what's more it's not out of some macho bullshit or some kind of sexual thing. it's something beyond that she loves him by the end of the adventure and he loves her and once more there is no sex involved here. Cheif doesn't care to save cortana's virtual life because he thinks he'll get her as a prize at the end. it's because he deeply attatched to her in deep but plotonic way.

 And what I found on my second play through of halo 4 is that little moments make me tear up because I know even more her fate. it feels like,on some levels, that your watching a terminally ill cancer patient whom tries to cheer up now and again but you know she'll die very soon. not that this makes me immune to criticism but I do have a brother dying of cancer as we speak. my point is you slowly see Cortana get worse and worse until finally the end of the game and cortana happens. -tears- and John and Cortana speak their last words ever to each other.... it just breaks your heart like any good story should do. and yet it's sadness for a computer program a tactical simulatior that can is ment to get the spartan out of even the worst of situations. she's not who I should feel for and yet I do so deeply feel for her. as well as  I do John.   Maybe it's the actor in me but I honestly feel empathy for both of them when Sarkeesian dictates that it's just a cheap trick to cover up shallow games that supposedly teach us that the best way to resolve a conflict is with violence.    when you know the rehtoric being spewed and yet you play the game again and again with the same teary eyed result....when you play the game secretly hoping that you can find a cure and fix Cortana,even knowing that you don't and can't.... it makes you so mad that anyone would say that this game is shallow or that Cortana is not well designed or voiced character. cause then you aren't smiply insulting the game,gaming industry ,writers game devs etc. now your insulting  Jennifer Lee "JenTaylor.  You're telling her that not only did she fail to bring the character to life,but that she's also complicit in participating in the hatered of women,and all women, and her mother or possible other female siblings because that's what people Like Sarkeesain would have you believe. unless you believe other feminists in that "Jen" had no choice and was forced to take the job lest she become poor in this "man's world".

  Not all Games posses this level of detail. not all games can make me care about the character or their surroundings and some games really are as shallow as Sarkeesian would have you believe. But Halo is not one of them. it's a series of games that I never really get bored of playing and when I finally play halo 4 again I know I'll be sobbing because the game is that well made and I look forward to the fifth game when it drops later this year. I think I've even caught my son tearing up at the end through he tries to hide it well. so I cannot be the only one who gets all teary eyed at the end of the game.  Because at the end of this it isn't just that I would wish people would see halo for what it is and stop ranting about how it ruined gaming it's that I'd love to see more male gamers admit that,at the very least, the game made them care about halo. cause as it stands it's still seen as a frat boys game and that and I qoute "no one plays halo for the story." this is often what I hear as an excuse to shit on the game by actual gamers and not pop culture feminists. and it's sad cause I do play it for the story and I really wish more people did too. as to what I think of the collection as a game well that'll have to wait for another time.
Not Long ago I opened my mouth to ask a question of a Youtube sensation Shoe0nhead about a video she had made that was sort of borthering me. I asked about a joke,was treated as if I didn't get humor and now I have to deal with Dick Cheeses like this person found below:

 " Aug 3

How do you feel now that you have encountered humor for the first time and it was explained to you?"

 Since twitter only gives you so many characters to work with, because I believe this person to be part troll part serious let me start off with "Fuck you, most people had moved on from this and yet you come into a thread that had nothing to do with this and bring this back up the surface."

 I am not embarassed and I,Infact, stand by what I said. part of it is the nature of comedy itself where as part of it is also the kind of year I had before it. so let me take this in reverse order for the cheap seats. 2014 was one of the worst years for me and for people I respected. I've seen people say things that contradicted earlier things said and this has lead to me being a little gun shy when it comes to hearing messages that seem to be contrary to their nature.

 case in point would be my dear ex-friend Ujames1978 whom I made t-shirts for chartity store for. he was a smart person,smarter then me infact. he cared a lot about people and about rights and freedoms. but around 2014 he started getting on board with "we need to teach men not to rape." at first I thought he must be joking and instead he doubled down telling me about this amorrpheous patriarchy and how oppressed women in the first world really still are despite the evidence being to the contrary.  and he's not the only one. many good persons smart persons from Youtube were falling like Domino's one by one till almost all of really good friends were now spouting the kind of hate that would make hitler blush,not all of it releated to feminism of the third wave kind.

 so one can see,I would hope,that I was almost used to people saying things like Shoe's Joke only meaning the contradiction as they turn from good people to people who fucking believe in unsubstantiated bullshit. 

 Lastly it's about Humor. I've been dealing with this issue of mine ever since the simspons stopped being funny,ever since most of channel awesomes jokes became eyerolling and there are people still willing to tell me that Spoony, that PewDiePie guy and Adam Sandler  are as hillarious as they always were. and to them that is the right answer but to me it's not and yet we can be both right. Humor is subjective and sometimes it's not what you say but how you say it. Take comedians like Bill Cosby for instance. He was the originator of jokes that people like Carlos Mencia,Denis Leary and many others took jokes from Bill Cosby. and While some of Cosbys original works are hilarious others are just meh. and yet when say Denis Leary tells the same joke his way those meh jokes are absolutely funny.

 Surely you've known people who taken a perfectly good Joke and cannot tell it right to save their life and thus,even though it's a joke, you don't find it particularly funny.  sometimes it's the way they emphisis one word over another,or it's the way they say the punch line that can turn a bill cosby joke into a dennis leary joke (even of the practices of taking others jokes is frowned upon.)   I think you get my point. I knew it was a joke. but due to previous year of lossing people I respect to things I don't respect and the way June told the joke,IE:her tone of voice  it just didn't resinate with me as the jokes I knew June can do and it wasn't funny. these two are why I asked her such an obvious question.

 so my point is that to me she told a joke but she didn't sell the joke for me. and I'd like to think that I wasn't the only one who that joke fell flat for or I would have been dog piled by more then the two people who spoke up. I stood my ground on it despite how many favs June's comments to me got.  but if I am right and your just a board troll who's looking to score on someone then piss off I have better things to do with my time then to deal with this Shoe0nHead subjective crap this far from the incident in question.

Sonicchucuteb by badcop69
Sonicchucuteb
a small chibi sonichu in a sonichu costume. made with awww's and wuv.  
Loading...
Hello Dear Reader,It's the Badcop69. and while my name may sound crude I assure you that I myself am in the up and up. so this won't be so much a personal story as a mostly dry research into the world most dare not go into.

 Some hackers have dumped "personal" information of some 30 million users who were signed up at one time to Ashley Madison. Ashely Madison was warned that if they didn't shut down the site then the hackers would release the information of it's user base online and Ashely Madison said no. So the hackers (whom some herold as heros,but I do not) leaked the information online much the amusement and horror of the viewing public.

 The hackers did so for a number of reasons. firstly that Ashely Madison has others ventures online including a site where rich people can sign up to hook up with much younger woman,a male prositute site and supposidly they are also involved in human trafficing... most claims which I have seen next to no evidence as being real (but if you the audience or even the hackers wish to correct me with some evidence then I'll kindly recant this part of my rant.) but I'll get a little more into that in a moment. The second charge is that well..Ashely Madison is a scam.   Oh they give you what you pay for as far as hooking you up. but to have yourr account and information scrubbed from the site is 200$ and there is no garuntee that they actually delete all your information.

 So let me get to the first charge and work my way back. Firstly "Human trafficing" this is a term that is really really hard to deal with because what do they mean by it? are we going by the dictionary " hu·man traf·fick·ing
noun
  1. the illegal movement of people, typically for the purposes of forced labor or commercial sexual exploitation." 
or are we going by the more expanded deffinition which can,if one is so inclinded,include women who choose to go into porn of their own free will.  www.theguardian.com/com…  which is extremely dishonest and I know cause I personally know a few porn stars (one of whom left a job in STEM field to work in porn).  the point is that one MUST define ones terms lest they fall into the same comfirmation bias that leads people like anti-porn feminists to see strong able bodied porn actresses as victims whom need to be saved from themselves.  and that's not okay because we can no longer levi the claim of "human trafficing" and have it mean what the deffintion of Trafficing actually is. not what we want the deffinition to be.  so for a claim like this I need proof not just your word. because it's too easy to see a hacker or even an astronaut as being immune from frailties of the human mind and bias and yet,as recent events have shown: www.msn.com/en-us/video… that is not just untrue but absurd.

 Now onto the second claim. That is the one that people should give a shit about because this just a more dressed up version of earlier scams: www.huffingtonpost.com/… there was another website that would post your personal information and a photo and then label you a sex offender and you had to pay 100$ to get your information off the site after you prove you aren't a sex offender. all these have no garuntee that they will actually take your information off even if you pay them in full. People use social stigmas to scam people out of money especially if they can get a hold of your information. what Ashely Madison was doing in this respect is absolutely wrong and I agree with the hackers on this.

 Sadly that's not what people care about the most. what people care about is that people cheated on their spouces and I often hear it talked about in mostly male terms (we don't know the break down as of yet but there are women on the site as well who were registering,we assume,to cheat on their husband or their wife since hey gay marriage is a thing now) and this is perhapse the most shameful thing out of all of this. we don't care that Ashley Madison might be linked the human trafficing (again citiation needed for that) we don't care that they used social stigmas to blackmail people who wanted off the site or charged their minds about cheating. no we care that people cheated.

 For one thing this information doesn't always effect the people finding out about it as seen here: www.newser.com/story/21…  but if that wasn't enough we have to look at what is cheating. No I won't pull out the dictionary this time cause that's not what I mean. the point is often that we look at cheating through the eyes of monagamy and yet we in general aren't monagamous species if you look at the history of relationships dating back to as far as we have documented: www.tubeplus.is/.../Pen…  www.google.com/url?sa=…

 We often like to think in a very Disney-esc kind of way that someday we meet someone special..we fall madly in love with them and after a time we marry them and maybe have kids and live happily ever after. But that's not how things go. and sometimes Cheating is not only warrented but healthy for a marriage as seen here: www.slate.com/articles/…  then there are people who are actively polyamourous as seen here: 
watch-series-tv.to/episode/pen…  who even have kids and the kids aren't alway poly themselves.  Now polyamoury ISN'T the same as polygamy. Polygamy is the idea of marrying multiple people but doesn't always involve love. Polyamory actually does involve love and tends to involve loving more then one person on a deep deep level.

 I've met many Poly artist here on DeviantArt and they actually taught me what that was since it's very taboo to speak about it in general and considered a dirty word.  persons who are poly are seen as people "cheating with permission" which is still seen as cheating. they get subjected to slut shaming and all manners of being seen as unclean because they're genitals are in more then one person. which is silly if you stop to think about it especially since women are seen as std riddeled whores while the men are mostly just seen as commitent phobic dogs.  and for once rad fems are right that this sort of thing is really stupid and can be harmful if the people are in the wrong community and get shunned. people can seriously lose their jobs in the wrong town.

 beyond that there are extenuating circumstances. example: I have a co-worker who shall remain nameless. he was married and his wife suffered a horrible accident that left her paralized mostly from the waist down. as you can imagine she lost more then just sensation in her genitals,she lost interest in sex.  to his credit my friend and co-worker stayed faithful to his wife even when she gave him the go ahead to cheat on her so long as he stayed with her. and it tore him up inside. eventually he found a mate in another friend and co-worker of mine whom I'll call jane.  they fell madly in love but the guy wouldn't go all the way with my friend despite having permission to do so.  we talked and talked about his struggle and I did my best to set him straight on things. He divorced his wife and then later married my friend Jane. their blended family is very very happy and they are as well.  Now my friends are great people. not hoe's and homewreckers. they found love in an unlikely situation.  but their situation isn't all that different to what I hear coming from places like upper society. where if the male of the house cannot perform the wife is given permission to cheat and often they do indulge. and we know they indluge because sometimes it becomes very public: www.nydailynews.com/new…
 yet we don't bash the rich and powerful when they do it. and we know that some higher up then that have mistresses www.cnbc.com/2015/04/17…  yet we don't condemn them for that practice. one that dates back long into human history.www.google.com/url?sa=…   

  and all this is coming from me. I am polyamours but I am planning on spending the rest of my life with one woman. she is an amazing woman who completes me like no one else can and I love her dearly. Despite my proclivity I have no desire (nor time) to cheat on her because I have been cheated on by a woman who was an absolutely scumbag. who cheated on me without caring for my feelings. But I have also been cheated on by a woman who hated how deeply she hurt me and yet she went on to marry the man she cheated on me with,have a kid and is living happily ever after.

 some people who cheat are just what we think...scum. others however aren't scum or horrible people. my point is that at the end of the day I don't know any of the people on the list,so far as I can tell, and neither do you. and it's hipocrisy to not want to be judged as a group,for what ever you may stand for or be a part of,and then turn around and judge people as a group. and the ones I see doing the shaming are just that,Hipoctites mascurating as some kind of high and mightey,holier then thou kinds who feel they have every right to point and laugh at these people or to call them stupid,not because Ashely Madison is grifiting them,but because they signed onto a site for cheaters,because cheating is always bad always. well fuck you is the best I can say to that.
 

deviantID

badcop69
Aaron-Kun
Artist | Hobbyist | Varied
United States
 photo alwaysandforever_zpsbb6931ae.png
Heart - Canada by uppuN:iconmrskittiehoshino::iconbadcop69:Heart - USA by uppuN

In a Loving Relationship with :iconmrskittiehoshino:



Current Residence:
deviantWEAR sizing preference: small
Favourite genre of music: any and all (except poka just don't get it.)
Favourite photographer: jeannieblue
Favourite style of art: chibi, anime,contemporay,pop too many to list
Operating System: xp baby
MP3 player of choice: phillips
Favourite cartoon character: too many to list
Interests

AdCast - Ads from the Community

Friends

Comments


Add a Comment:
 
:iconbjsparky:
BJSparky Featured By Owner Apr 3, 2015  Professional Interface Designer
Thank you so much for the watch! Your videos helped me in writing my "To Debunk and Correct" series! :D
Reply
:icongynandromorph:
Gynandromorph Featured By Owner Feb 9, 2015  Hobbyist General Artist
I looked up this article: www.eurogamer.net/articles/201…
Reply
:iconsatat:
satat Featured By Owner Jan 16, 2015  Professional General Artist
Many thanks for the +fav on fav.me/d7uqg7d

-- sataBlank satablank.deviantart.com <- new gallery
Reply
:iconfaytrobertson:
faytrobertson Featured By Owner Jan 14, 2015
thanks for the fav
Reply
:icongraece:
Graece Featured By Owner Jan 12, 2015
Hey stranger. Long time no talk. Lets catch up sometime. 
Reply
:iconbluemalou:
blueMALOU Featured By Owner Dec 22, 2014  Hobbyist Photographer

www.youtube.com/watch?v=8E8Wwo…    An emoticon Christmas by phaethorn  :    Reply Comments Stamp by Mirz123    

  

Reply
:iconbjsparky:
BJSparky Featured By Owner Nov 16, 2014  Professional Interface Designer
Hey! Thanks so much for favouriting my analysis on Tropes vs. Women in Video Games. Your videos helped me make it. :D
Reply
:icondominikscherrer:
DominikScherrer Featured By Owner Oct 28, 2014  Hobbyist Traditional Artist
Many thanks for the fav Aaron!
Reply
Add a Comment: